Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Giovanni

Maximalism and heroism. Opportunism Andrea Grillo tries to play between “love joy” e “The Splendor of Truth”. With posthumous appendix on the case of Archbishop Luigi Negri

- defend the Holy Father from false friends -

Maximalism AND HEROISM. Opportunism ANDREA CRICKET THAT TRIES TO PLAY BETWEEN THE JOY OF LOVE E TRUTH SHINE. WITH APPENDIX posthumous ON THE CASE OF ARCHBISHOP LUIGI NEGRI

.

The moral ideas of Andrea Grillo produce of Don Abbondio, ready to obey the first rascal who happen, the smart ones who want to get away on the cheap and with the aura of the Prophet, of court jesters or flatterers of the master who pays them well, of the Machiavellian dictator Service, the opportunists pushed by the wind that pulls, of Talleyrand who are always afloat, adept at saving your skin in all circumstances, of cowards ready to kneel down to the ground and kiss the feet of the first bully that makes its voice. Therefore, certain ideas and ways of acting, do not produce the eagle's flight, but the cackling of hens in the henhouse.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

I charge you to keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ [The Tm 6,14]

.

.

Giovanni Cafarra

Giovanni Cavalcoli in the Dominican convent of Bologna, Cardinal Carlo Caffarra at the opening of the diocesan phase of the beatification process of the Dominican theologian Tomas Tyn

Andrea Grillo intervened the 3 Last May, on its website European Cultural Magazine a short article entitled "love joy: Beyond The Splendor of Truth, ie on this side of the moral maximalism " [cf. readable text WHO]», which he sees in 'love joy a contrast, or rather an approach to the question of the relationship between moral law and moral circumstances of the act, "That would be no exaggeration to define" diametrically opposite "" with respect to The Splendor of Truth of St. John Paul II, which according to him would be tainted by "maximalism", "Rationalism" and contempt for the "tradition", while 'love joy, "She realizes with great power and with a Prophetic tradition recovery ', so it 'processes, in section. VIII, an understanding of the "wounds of the family", which proposes a relationship between "rules" and "discernment" which retrieves an ancient ecclesial wisdom, with respect to which a "Desktop cold morality" [cf. The joy of love, 312] He had claimed to distance itself dramatically and maximalist ".

.

This contrast made by Grillo between these two great papal documents is totally false and sophistic, slanderous towards Saint John Paul II and blatantly flattering towards Pope Francis, according to a costume objectionable that has spread among the flatterers modernists reigning Pope, for example, also Enzo Bianchi. If anything is to be said that the two documents complement and illuminate each other, because while the encyclical of Giovanni Paolo II stopped more about some basic principles of moral theology, the Apostolic Exhortation of Pope Francis takes greater account of local conditions, the circumstances and manner, in which the subject agent must apply, in the case of married life, the moral law.

.

How silly is the accusation made by some to the Pope to relativize the moral law, or to question the indissolubility of marriage or even the sacredness of the Eucharist, as if to encourage moral laxity, equally foolish is the accusation made by Grillo to a Holy Pontiff, an expert in pastoral care, of "maximalism" moral, ie abstractness, stiffness, excessive demands, too much severity and poor understanding of human weaknesses, As if he lacked compassion and sense of circumstances.

.

There is no doubt that not only for the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II, but also for the Holy Father Francis adultery is a intrinsically evil, because this concept, as is clear from the The Splendor of Truth, It is necessarily linked with the words of Christ himself on the indissolubility of marriage and the prohibition of adultery.

.

But Unlike the case of adultery and the dissolution of marriage. Adultery is always prohibited without exception. In the second case, however - apart from the Mosaic law about changed by Christ -, St. Paul gives permission to the believing mate, whose faith is endangered by non-believing mate, to leave, so that the marriage is dissolved. It is the so-called Pauline privilege. So we read in Moral Theology Dictionary directed by Cardinal Francesco Roberti [1], to the item Pauline privilege: «The so-called Pauline privilege is contained in I Cor 7, 11-16. […] For it can melt only legitimate marriage, also consumed, namely to contract by two unbaptized, if one of them is converted to Christianity. It does not apply to marriage between a baptized and an infidel, Contract previous dispensation from the impediment of disparity of cult ".

.

Here we have a sacred value - the marriage bond -, to which in two different ways opposes a certain human act. But what abysmal difference in the one in the other case! Adultery is a private act by which a man does a grave sin against the indissolubility and sacredness of marriage, so that the bond remains intact. The dissolution of the bond is a public act of legitimate ecclesiastical authority, authorized by the doctrine of St. Paul.

.

Here we see that the difference, regarding the sacrament of marriage legislation, between the divine institution (Christ's will) and the legal power of authority of the Church ("Power of the keys"). While Christ gave to the Church and then to the moral from it taught - with all due respect to Grillo - to make exceptions to the prohibition of adultery and divorce, He has granted to the Church, through St. Paul, the faculty, in certain cases, to dissolve the marriage bond.

.

A foul play

.

Grillo plays unfairly sull'inveterato idealistic misunderstanding, which gives the primacy of subject on 'object, meaning by subject consciousness as intended by Descartes, ie not regulated by the truth, but as a rule of truth, not as thought by the idea it adapts to the real, but as real or be (sum) deducted from the thought (cogito) or idea, so the truth for Descartes is not what is really there in front of me (object), independently of me (if anything dependent on God), but what I (subject, "subject") I decide to be the truth and reality. Now, we must say that it is true that if I think, it means that I exist, but it is even more true that in order to think, I must first exist. Hence the primacy of being over thought and so on consciousness. The dissolution of being in thought and subjective consciousness is the folly of idealism, producer of metaphysical solipsism, theoretical soggettivismo, moral relativism and corruption, emotional disorders, hallucinatory or autistic disorders, illusions to no end.

.

This principle, carried to its extreme consequences produced the Hegelian identification and Gentile being in thought. This is the modern subject Grillo pleases and that he has unwittingly put in the place of God, for it is only God, Self-awareness is only the divine, which it is being rule, of truth and conscience.

.

It is clear that if subject, according to the idealistic language, It means the world of spirit or consciousness, while 'object are the things external materials, it has the primacy of the subject, that the spirit, on the object, that is to say on the matter. But if by Subject, according to the realist language, we mean thought and by object we mean the real, Here is the thought that has to adapt to the real. But it must be said that consciousness is not intended as absolute source of truth, but as a moral obligation to accept the truth. Instead, what Grillo called "modern subject", is nothing more than the modernist concept of consciousness, for which Father Arturo Sosa speaks of "primacy of conscience", forgetting, as I have shown in my previous article dedicated to him, that consciousness has no record either in the know, where the record goes to the intuition of reality, nor much less in the context of being, where the primacy goes to the truth of being, objective rule of the truth of conscience.

.

Comparison between The Splendor of Truth e love joy.

.

So, if one side is right in claiming that Pope Francis:

.

  1. "It is true that the general rules are good that one should never disregard or neglect, but in their formulation can not absolutely embrace all special situations' [love joy 304]. That does not deny the existence of inalienable values, namely 'intrinsically good O the virtuous, nor it means that the fact that the legislature ignore all possible cases admits the possibility of cases in which we can make an exception to the law.

.

  1. "The Church has a solid reflection on the conditioning and the mitigating circumstances. Therefore it is no longer possible to say that all those who are in some situation so-called "irregular" they live in a state of mortal sin, deprived of sanctifying grace " [love joy 301]. You can alternating periods in which they have grace periods in which they are in sin, devoid of grace.

.

  1. "It's possible that by an objective situation of sin - that is not subjectively guilty or that it is not so full - we can live in God's grace, you can love, and it can also grow in the life of grace and charity, receiving for this purpose the help of the Church " [love joy 305].

.

  1. "You have to accompany with mercy and patience possible stages of growth of the people who are building day by day, giving way to the mercy of the Lord who inspires us to do good can […] Jesus wants a Church attentive to the good that the Spirit spreads in the middle of the fragility: a mother, at the very moment in which he clearly expresses his target education, can not give up the good, although it runs the risk of getting dirty with mud of the road " [love joy, 308]. It is clear that the use of accompaniment, of mercy, understanding, tolerance and patience, in certain circumstances does not exclude, in other circumstances, the stimulus, incitement, the warning, recall, the reprimand and warning.

.

On the other side did well Saint Giovanni Paolo II to remember that:

.

  1. "They give the human act of items that are considered" not being ordered to God ", because they radically contradict the good of the person, made in his image " [The Splendor of Truth, 80].

.

  1. In the moral tradition of the Church human acts that are directed to those objects "they are called intrinsically evil (intrinsically evil): they are always and per se, that is, by their very purpose, apart from the ulterior intentions of those acts or circumstances' [truth Spendor, 80].

.

  1. "The circumstances and intentions can never transform an act intrinsically evil for its object into an act 'subjectively' good or defensible as a choice" [The Splendor of Truth, 81].

.

Here there is no maximalism, no rigor, no stiffness, no rationalism, no exaggerated claim. No stiffness or too strict requirement, but wise and prudent flexibility in adapting the call to perfection, the possibilities and own needs of each. The Pope knows what God can ask the man, where man can be responsible and where he is worthy of pity.

.

"The Church - says St. Giovanni Paolo II [The Splendor of Truth,95] ―, that can never renounce the "the principle of truth" and consistency, why not agree to call good evil and evil good, must always be careful not to break the bruised reed, and to quench the dimly burning wick [cf Is 42,3]. Blessed Paul VI wrote: "To diminish in no way the saving teaching of Christ constitutes an eminent form of charity for souls. But this must ever be accompanied by patience and goodness, such as the Lord himself gave example of in dealing with men. Having come not to condemn but to save [cf. GV 3,17], He was intransigent with evil, but merciful towards individuals "».

.

It is perfectly reasonable considerations, based on rational concept of the good man and his ultimate goal, who is God. The knowledge of this order is provable, as is known, natural reason, it is an order or absolute good, that requires absolutely, failing which the man fails in life. The rules to follow to achieve the ultimate goal, namely natural law, The reason derives from the consideration of man as a rational animal.

.

Christian morality creates saints, no half figures

.

If the mountain guide indicates downstream walker to the peak to conquer, certainly it does not claim that he reaches the suddenly with a jump, or crosses his mind to reproach him if he does not immediately, but apparently it is ready to help and to accompany him, with thoughtfulness and wisdom, in the slow climb to the top.

.

To facilitate the journey of life we must lower the moral ideal or have discounts on our own initiative, but put all our good will with the help of grace, trusting in the mercy of God, but without taking advantage of his kindness slyly to make our comfortable. We must be able to present to the next, whoever he is, the Christian ideal in all its loftiness, assure our help and especially encourage him to make the most - that's the good "maximalism"! - trusting in the Lord.

.

Saint Giovanni Paolo II does not call for the impossible, but it reminds everyone of the highest dignity of the person and of his responsibility, created in God's image, without forgetting all its miseries, consequent to sin, especially in today's climate of widespread intellectual disorientation, and on the limits of human nature eternally established by the Creator and overcome to varying degrees by the life of grace and holiness, gift of the Savior's mercy.

.

And Pope Francis is not the manipulator ambiguous or that cunning lax that some would have us believe. instead, you must, with careful exegesis and benevolent, take note of his pastoral wisdom and the fact that love joy he adds to The Splendor of Truth indications lenient case, which does not give the space The Splendor of Truth, more theoretical approach. It is true that some steps of love joy, for unclear, They can cause problems, but much is clarified by resorting to the previous Magisterium, starting from Familiar Consortium.

.

Let's say instead Grillo that we must not confuse the seriousness and moral rigor with rigor, the moral effort with maximalism, loyalty to our promises, to our vocation or ideal inviolable and sacred purpose we have set ourselves, with conservatism or stagnation or fundamentalism or stubbornness or "closed to new".

.

The moral principles of Grillo, spoiled by historicism, are too weak and fragile to produce not say of the martyrs and heroes, but even people of character, with robust backbone. If Maria Goretti had taken Andrea Grillo's ideas on sex and marriage, He would certainly have granted requests for Alessandro Serenelli, that at least distinguish the man from the woman and made no confusion between the sexes.

.

The moral ideas Grillo produce of Don Abbondio, ready to obey the first rascal who happen, the smart ones who want to get away on the cheap and with the aura of the Prophet, of court jesters or flatterers of the master who pays them well, of the Machiavellian dictator Service, the opportunists pushed by the wind that pulls, of Taillerand who are always afloat, adept at saving your skin in all circumstances, of cowards ready to kneel down to the ground and kiss the feet of the first bully that makes its voice. Therefore, certain ideas and ways of acting, do not produce the eagle's flight, but the cackling of hens in the henhouse.

.

Varazze, 23 May 2017

Translation of the Holy Father Domenico di Guzman

_______________

[1] Studium Publishing, Rome 1961.

.

.

APPENDIX posthumous ON THE CASE OF ARCHBISHOP LUIGI NEGRI

.

Andrea Grillo struck again. This time he attacked some thoughts of S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri, Emeritus Archbishop of Ferrara, on the attack in Manchester, very serious episode which was followed by the very recent massacre in Egypt [see the full texts WHO].

.
We need to detect real pain foolishness and irresponsibility of the aggression of the Archbishop Grillo. Cricket, that, with diabolical cunning, It uses a procedural defect in the thoughts of the illustrious and courageous Pastor, not understanding the literary module of which Mons. Luigi Negri has used to express, in an ideal heartfelt conversation with the poor boys killed, on the one hand his bitterness and his disdain for the umpteenth Islamic attack on Christianity, continuing an old tradition of centuries XIV and, on the other, duty to denounce the hypocrisy disgust of a rotten and secularized Europe ex-Christian, reduced to nihilism, denying with affected ignorance of the religious nature of Islamic terrorism and would like to hide behind this excuse to groped in vain to silence his conscience, that the prosecution and the storm for betraying Christ, not to defend the faith against Muslim attack and for having lost what the latest reasons for living, the rejoicing, the suffering and death.

.
Cricket is a dangerous and emblematic exponent of a corrupt and hypocritical Christianity papist, and burns the fact that Bishop. Luigi Negri, a good doctor and pastor, He has put his finger on the wound to heal, not to kill.
But Grillo, this, He not understood or do not want to understand, and so, proud and stubborn as, rather than reflect on the wise moral considerations of this Bishop and convert, accentuates its bitterness and doth his sophistry against those who called him back to his fatherly duties as a Christian, invoking a vain pretext criticism based sull'incomprensione unhappy literary form adopted by Mons. Luigi Negri.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Fathers of The Island of Patmos are together these days to work for you. We will resume the publication in early June

FATHERS DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS THESE DAYS I AM TOGETHER WORKING FOR YOU. We resume PUBLICATIONS AT THE BEGINNING JUNE.

.

.

Author Jorge A. Faccio Lince

Author
George A.. Faccio Lince

.

.

Dear Readers,

Convent St. Dominic varazze

Convent of San Domenico of Varazze (Savona)

Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo reach tomorrow with me the Father Giovanni Cavalcoli in her convent of Varazze, a beautiful resort located at the Cinque Terre in Liguria.

.

The Fathers of L'Island of Patmos, as well as talk about various publishing projects, a few days will work together for our Readers. They will in fact made of HD video footage of different theological lessons of Father Giovanni Cavalcoli, then we publish on Canal The Island of Patmos.

.

The Father Ariel and I then we will be traveling to different parts of Italy over the next ten days, Therefore, we caution you that we will take the publications at the beginning of June.

.

A prayer insured for all of our readers to the Blessed Vergine Maria of the Rosary.

.

.

NOTE OF 21 MAGGIO

Dear readers,

as you can see, Fathers de The Island of Patmos, They are already at work for you …

.

Varazze 3

.

Varazze 2

.

IMG_20170521_183752

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Giovanni

A modernist Pope? The falsity of Raniero La Valle

- defend the Holy Father from false friends -

A POPE MODERNISTA? THE SHAM OF THE VALLEY RANIERO

.

It is very sad and outrageous that a valuable and long-life experience man like La Valle has fallen so low slandering the Pope while he believes to praise him, not to have noticed to have become, with his blasphemies, miserable instrument of a Masonic plan of destruction of the Church, inexorably destined to failure, surely fail as all enemies of God.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

Raniero Valley and the Holy Father

Raniero La Valle and the Pope Francis I

Raniero La Valle, as is the custom usual modernists, especially Rahnerians, He claims to submit his thesis as a heretical interpretation of the doctrines of the Council, ma, since reigns the present Pope, modernists have increased their audacity and brazenness, and they have come to the point of presenting their heresies even as the thought of the Holy Father himself, taking advantage of some of his occasional expressions, that, unlike the previous Pontiffs language, it was always clear, if you pay, if it is not correctly interpreted and contextualized, to be understood in a sense or modernist rahneriano [following article …].

.

To read the entire article click below:

.

Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON — A MODERNIST POPE? THE SHAM OF THE VALLEY RANIERO

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The gaystapo now will charge forward priesthood. Well we reiterate: They are not legitimate nor apply the ordination of people with structurally-seated homosexual tendencies

THE GAYSTAPO NOW IS LAUNCHED THE ATTACK OF THE PRIESTHOOD. WELL CONFIRMED: NEITHER ARE NOT VALID LEGITIMATE ORDERING PRIESTS OF PERSONS WITH HOMOSEXUAL TENDENCIES STRUCTURALLY ROOTED

.

You can not make peace in the consciousness merely public and severe proclamations, when in fact gay priests increased in proportion to the presence of bishops who reason with a latent homosexual psychology. Or to put it raw: some seminarians between the seventies and the eighties capeggiavano inside of the seminars Gay pious confraternity, Today they are bishops, and just become such, first they are surrounded by related parties, placed more and rigor in all the key posts in the diocese, traineeships. And these subjects, that protects and reproduce each other, they ended up creating a powerful lobby of power within the Church. The question which now arises concerns thus the validity of sacred ordination of subjects in whom appear increasingly absent the minimum requirements for the validity of the sacrament of Holy Orders, from the faith and the correct perception of the Catholic priesthood.

.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

It's been aberrant laws on marriage between same-sex couples, They have passed laws on adoption devilish data babies to gay and lesbian, which in many countries it is given chance to fabricate and buy creatures wombs for rent. All under the banner of “rights” and an unnamed “love“. Now, in the name of “rights” and such “love“, If the tip “right” the priesthood for gay people. At this rate, as the outlawing of that dangerous homophobe of the Blessed Apostolo Paolo and the deletion from the sacred texts of his words mixed with the supreme tenets of the LGBT lobby, especially where he warns: "Make no mistake: neither fornicators, born idolatry, nor adulterers, ne prostitutes, born sodomiti […] they will inherit the kingdom of God "? [The Cor 6, 9-10].

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos

.

.

Christian homosexuals

… the priesthood is not a claimable right from LGBT groups

The Fathers ofPatmos Island They published in July 2016 Two short essays in the section Theologica, facing a complex and sensitive issue on the theological and legal: about the effective validity of the priestly ordinations of subjects lacking the correct perception of the Catholic priesthood and about the effective validity of the priestly ordinations of candidates for sacred orders with structurally rooted homosexual tendencies.

.

Not to mention the multiplication, not only in parishes, but even at the same seminar, Group Study and meeting place for gay Catholics. And these meetings - always to be honest and clear -, often they reduced to hard attacks to the Supreme Magisterium of the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II and Pope Benedict XVI Venerable, while the priest was foolish and improvident left by his bishop to sow the worst poisons, of calms their movements the gay audience and lesbians rincuorandoli: "Today, things have changed", because "the Church has come out of the dark and finally become welcoming and inclusive to everyone and everything". Including perhaps mortal sin?

.

Gay Catholics 2

… the priesthood is not a claimable right from LGBT groups

The now ubiquitous and powerful gay lobby, with a pompous language and infused with unacceptable mercies e of love, trying for some time to launch an attack at the heart of the Church: the legitimization of homosexual tendencies in relation to the sacred priesthood. And this to the point of anticipating “directives” in the form of “lovable proposals” the next Synod of Bishops which will take place on: "Young people, faith and vocational discernment " [see article WHO].

.

As sometimes it happens regarding certain burning issues, many of our readers have written to us to seek guidance. In all respond proposing two of our writings on this subject published ten months ago [cf. WHO, WHO], in which we believe we have analyzed the problem in all its serious depth …

.

To open items click below

.

07.07.2016 Ariel S. Levi Gualdo - DOUBTS ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF ORDERS OF HOMOSEXUAL PRIESTLY

.

07.07.2016 Giovanni Cavalcoli, OP — THE QUESTION OF THE VALIDITY OF PRIESTLY ORDINATIONS TODAY

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Giovanni

La domenicana alia the true joy of love: open letter to Prof. Andrea Grillo

THE REAL WAY TO DOMINICAN JOY OF LOVE: OPEN LETTER TO PROF. ANDREA GRILLO

.

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra no way opposed to freedom of conscience, She accuses him how to do, but it opposes, rightly, the subjectivist conception, its modernism, that is the individual conscience, dell’ “I”, the meter, the principle and the ultimate criterion of truth.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Domini canes - cartoon

Dominicans in comics …

The marital status is called "regular", as it is supposed a valid marriage, while the concubinage or state of divorced and remarried is called "irregular", as their union is illegitimate. The question of regularity or irregularity touches the outer hole, not the interior of conscience before God. In fact, one can be in a regular state (such religious) and be devoid of grace and, conversely one may be in a state irregular and be grace.

.

We must therefore distinguish it was legal and canonical from It was the will. The first is an external appearance of the person or a state of life, socially visible, and can be regular, ie according to the rule; or irregular, ie against the rule. A religious, voted to regular life, It can lead to an irregular life. A layman, not required to follow a religious life rule, It can be more regular than a bad religion. The state of the will is an inner state, for only best known to God and to the subject. It can be good - good will - and is supported by grace; or bad - ill will - and then it is devoid of grace. The latter is the state of sin […] The divorced and remarried can be in any state or situation, that, on reasonable grounds or force majeure, It can not be stopped. However, they Peccano, instead they have the possibility of interrupting the state of sin by penance and recover the lost grace [It follows the full article …]

.

To read the entire article click below:

Giovanni Cavalcoli, OP - THE REAL WAY TO DOMINICAN JOY OF LOVE: OPEN LETTER TO PROF. ANDREA GRILLO

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Pope Clement XV corrects "Amoris Laetitia" with his motu proprio: "With great sadness», confirming the discipline of St. Giovanni Paolo II on the subject of divorced and remarried

THE POPE CLEMENT XV CORRECTING THE 'JOY OF LOVE"WITH HIS MOTU PROPRIO «When great sadness », CONFIRMING THE DISCIPLINE OF JOHN PAUL II IN THE MATTER OF DIVORCED REMARRIED

.Clement XV with island

Apostolic Letter in the form of motu proprio
With great sadness

.

To Our Venerable Brethren the Patriarchs,
RECEIVE, ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS
And other Ordinaries
IN PEACE AND COMMUNION
With the Apostolic See:
THE PROBLEM OF ADMISSION TO THE DIVORCED EUCHARIST REMARRIED

.

PP CLEMENTE. XV

Bishop of the Catholic Church

Servant of the Servants of God

.

Clement XV header ok.

With great sadness but with great apostolic concern, Sum of Our Authority we state that the Apostolic Exhortation love joy It should be read and placed in a complex historical context of decay characterized by a profound loss doctrinal and pastoral, because if isolated from this humus, you will not understand nor his lexical style nor the laudable effort in its preparation. Of this document they remain unquestioned and the good intentions that have animated, all he aimed to address and resolve issues related to the family and marriage in relation to the many and varied contemporary societies of the world, that since the seventies of the twentieth century have gone to meet progressive disintegration, in a society that tends now to deny the eternal becoming, the immutable and absolute unbreakable. A serious problem, the latter, resulting from the loss of metaphysical language within the Holy Church of Christ, and especially in theological speculation and in the transmission of the truths of faith. The abandonment of this language, largely solidified and inherent to the mission and the very nature of the Church, has often been replaced with styles and forms of expression that idiomatic, on the doctrine of the Holy transmission plan, They have created problems and sometimes even disastrous consequences.

.

The power of the keys, the certainty and clarity

.

love joy is a long text dealing with a wide variety of topics mostly sociological, ending with be ambiguous in some important steps and we proved weak, why not always clear on some fundamental elements in which it is not wise or prudent to leave room for vagueness and the free interpretations of the individual Bishops' Conferences, individual priests or the various theological schools of thought, that need to be guided and directed with more clear and precise words. Indeed, Christ the Lord, giving the Blessed Apostolo Pietro the power of the keys [cf. Mt 16, 18-19], He commanded him to confirm his brothers in faith: «Simone, Simone, behold Satan has demanded to sift you like wheat; but I prayed for you, that thy faith fail not:; and you, turned again, confirm your brothers " [LC 22, 31-32]. This heavy-duty power service, by Blessed Apostolo Pietro was transmitted to all his successors, up to Us, we profess we devoted servant of the servants of God.

.

Our fundamental premise of the Petrine ministry is so sure, clarity and escape from any vagueness, as he remembered the Blessed Apostolo Paolo to the Blessed Apostle Peter during the reproach he moved to Antioch to the Head of the College of the Apostles, with all due respect to his undisputed authority [Gal 2,1-2.7-14].

.

The interpretations that can be derived from different pages of love joy They can be opposed and both consistent on the basis of what it can be deduced speculative and interpretative level, which leads us to reiterate that the doctrinal language must be clear, unique and not subject to conflicting interpretations, place that our speech should be "You, and, no, no» [cf. Mt 5, 37]. Therefore, before any question of moral doctrine, it is not contemplated that any suggestion that the answer could be "yes", but also wanting to "no", if anything, a bit '' yes 'and a little' 'no'.

.

As the Supreme Guardian of the deposit of faith is upon us an obligation and duty to ensure that the sull'ovile Divine Shepherd has entrusted us, preventing the small seed but dangerous ambiguity, shoots up to undermine and circumvent the doctrine of the Holy Church of Christ through pastoral practice, why allow such germination does not amount to meet the modern needs of today's society, but disregard a rule laid down by the Word of God concerning sacramental marriage: "For what man does not separate what God has joined" [Mt 19,3-12].

.

The man is conformed to Christ, and Christ is not conformed to man.

.

This is why we reiterate that it is the Holy Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God made man, died, resurrected and ascended to heaven, He must transform man and human societies; He is the man who must conform to Christ, It can not be the man to transform the Holy Gospel nor can they be human societies to bring Christ to their needs of the moment. The commands given by Christ the Lord are immutable and eternal and can be neither dismissed nor evaded through ambivalent words from which to draw legitimacy for new pastoral practices related to the administration of the Holy Eucharist, which it is the center and summit of the Church's unity. Therefore, the right medicine and the right encouragement for those who have failed to commitments through the sacrament of marriage and living a new union outside the sacramental sphere, It may not be the Eucharist, well because others are appropriate medicines to be administered, from the reception of such children Our, to follow with their prompt and careful spiritual care.

.

The no Eucharist to divorced and remarried is an ecclesiastical discipline, not a dogmatic truth.

.

The prudent choice not to grant the Most Holy Eucharist to divorced and remarried is not a dogmatic element of the Catholic faith, but a discipline rules adopted by the Magisterium of the Church in fidelity to the moral taught and transmitted by the Holy Catholic tradition. So, for the power conferred to us by Christ the Lord, of Our authorities we could amend that legislation governing, but we do not intend to reform neither direct nor leaving creative autonomy the particular Churches and some national episcopates, because from what life would take a new pastoral practice in so-called non-homogeneous diffuse patchy, while the Church disciplines are unique and universal, as is his pastoral mission.

.

The decision not to grant the Most Holy Eucharist to divorced and remarried, and especially today in this history when marriage is weakened, It is also based on the conservative belief that this concession would end up further weaken the sacramental institution of marriage and the inescapable foundation and not be reformed its indissolubility [cf. Mt 19,3-12].

.

This is what we fear, and that clearly express to Our Brother Bishops: founded fear that through the Holy Eucharist can end up making even weaker than it already is, unfortunately, the indissolubility of the foundation of the sacrament of marriage to which, Unfortunately, nowadays no longer believe even many of our Catholic faithful. In this case, the Holy Eucharist would become more to that for which it was established, ceasing to be the heart of the communion and unity of the Church through the sacramental grace. And it must remember here that the sacraments are not a right or have acquired, but a free act of divine grace, that touches us and fills us with goods "not because of our merits but for the richness of Your forgiveness" [cf. S. Mass, Can. Rom.].

.

Never bothering to please the world: the discipline of “Family member company”.

.

Therefore, the total negligence of internal and public critical failures that could fall on Us, Mindful that the Roman Pontiff must aim to please Christ the Lord in doing His will, sanctifying himself and with his sanctifying the task of teaching and his works the believers of Christ; also mindful that we can not cure us of pleasure in the world, pleasing that we might run the risk of conducting blind guides as many members of the flock entrusted to us to fall into the ditch [cf. Mt 15,14], Our Brother Bishops to reaffirm that with regard to the pastoral care of divorced and remarried Catholics should be applied with care and zeal as indicated by our Holy Predecessor Giovanni Paolo II in his Apostolic Exhortation Family member company, with particular reference to the n. 84, reaffirming the non-permissibility, hence the impossibility of their access to the Holy Eucharist, both for reasons linked to pastoral prudence, both linked to the wise institute protection of sacramental marriage, already far too hard hit and debased in the last decades of the history of mankind.

.

The Bishops diligent care to always be loving and welcoming toward these Our faithful who are divorced and remarried for their irregular situations need to be made to feel even more vibrant part of the Holy Church, mindful that Christ did not fail to remind us: «It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. Go and learn what this means: I desire mercy, not sacrifice. For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners " [cf. Mt 9,13]. Nowhere in the Holy Gospel and at any time of His preaching, the Incarnate Word of God has ever said that to be welcoming and merciful to accomodate and legitimize the moral disorder, or that you have to be afraid to call and to indicate the moral disorder as such, moving on false pretexts of mercy and false acceptance. Our task is to accept and carry out the sinners from their sins, treating them in this way by the disease of sin; and a prerequisite for the remission of sins is the genuine repentance combined with the sincere intention and commitment not to fall into sin.

.

It promises the unfeasible and impractical to obtain a purpose.

.

To accept and treat, for pastors in the care of souls, however, it is very difficult to do and to practice, while it would be a lot easier to look for a solution to certain problems linked to the so-called irregular pairs granting them access to the Holy Eucharist, then declaring the non-existence of the serious problem constituted by the rupture of sacramental communion.

.

It has also advocated an "accompaniment" journey of these pairs of divorced and remarried, however, replacing the concept of spiritual direction with an unspecified "spiritual accompaniment". And here it would be good to note that "direct" and "accompanying" are not two simple ways to express the same thing, but to say and express two different things. It was then later clarified that this "accompaniment" was to "Custom" and as such need to be evaluated case by case, according to the needs of the single divorced and remarried couple. A perspective, this, before which it must first be a strong reminder to realism: the number of pairs of divorced and remarried is progressively increasing and the local Bishops Conferences come worrying statistical data which relate that in some regions of the world marriages that end with civil divorce are superior in percentage 50% of religious marriages celebrated. To these numbers it should be related then of necessity the current situation of the Catholic clergy. It is a fact that few bishops of the world during their visits at the threshold of the Apostles refer to the Roman Pontiff that the number of deceased priests is a lot higher than that of new priests ordained and that the average age of the clergy, in not a few dioceses, it is now also attested above seventy years of age. In Italy itself, ancient historic cradle of Catholicism and in whose territory is located two millennia Our Apostolic, the late nineteenth century, there were about eighty thousand priests for a population of about twenty-nine million inhabitants. At a distance of barely a century, at the end of the twentieth century, the priests present at the dawn of the new millennium were about thirty thousand for a population of around sixty million inhabitants. Today, in many dioceses of this country, There are eighty priests who celebrate Mass on Sunday in three different parishes, all now without a priest, while the age of priests is always higher and more numerous deaths of new ordinations. In many regions of the world there are priests who prior pardon of their Diocesan Ordinary celebrate at parties and days of obligation are seven, eight Masses a day. In many other regions of the Orbe catholica it is now impossible to guarantee in many communities even Mass on Sunday, because there is only one itinerant priest in charge of going in different pastoral areas now devoid of a priestly fixture, at which you can go only once a month, and only for the celebration of Holy Mass. In these cases, often, it is even impossible to administer the sacramental confessions of the individual faithful gathered in large numbers to the monthly celebration of Holy Mass, and the priest is thus forced to give general absolution for the purpose of the faithful to go to confession as soon as possible for them.

.

Illustrated as real and given that it is not our intention to establish the intentions of others processes, we must seriously ask ourselves: what is the relationship with the ecclesial reality, ecclesiastical and pastoral of those that in a situation such as the one above-illustrated, It even despite hypothesis and proposed that "accompanying", whereby follow with care every single couple in a long way "custom" of discernment and growth? Because the reality until summarized here could also lead to raise a serious and objective question: those who put forward proposals in itself is not likely to be realized and equally not possible to go, perhaps they do just to get the goal they have set, inwardly aware that no "accompanying", whereby follow with care every single couple in a long way "custom" of discernment and growth, It may even be minimally realized, in today's world in general, but particularly in those many of the world where the average statistics indicate the presence of a priest every 18.000/ 22.000 baptized? Or maybe put forward proposals in itself is not likely to be realized, and equally not possible to go, because totally it divorced from real and concrete ecclesial and pastoral reality?

.

Certainty of punishment for offenders.

.

We conclude that a given arrangement may produce its effects, if it not accompanied by adequate punishment for offenders. Therefore we determine that the diocesan bishops, which does not adhere to the norms dictated by Us, They are deprived of his episcopal chairs. The Presbyters, which preach and implement different disciplines, they are suspended for a period not less than one year from the exercise of the sacred priesthood. I theology, which in ecclesiastical universities, in theological training centers and houses of formation for priests, religious and laity, They teach a different doctrine than that which We confirmed, they are deprived of their license to teach Catholic theology. If this is not done in case of need, then the competent Ecclesiastical Authority will have to answer before God for having failed to apply a provision on the protection of the Catholic doctrine of the souls entrusted by God the Father to the care of the Holy Church of Christ, because "to whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " [LC 12, 48]. And every time that we all do the penitential rite, we ask God for forgiveness for having sinned not only in thoughts, in word and deed, but also omissions.

.

Clemente.bmp.

Given in Rome, at St. Peter's, the 13 May 2027, the 110th anniversary of the apparitions of Our Vergine Maria of Fatima, the first of Our Pontificate.

.

PDF Apostolic Letter print format

.

_____________________________________

.

.

Ariel itemsThe author of the text of the pseudo Clemente XV And, obviously, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. However, Who else could be? After it self-appointed Titular Bishop of Laodicea in the past Combusta via telecommunications lines, Now self-candidate with a chance at the next conclave, animated by the certainty that, worse than what has been done in recent years on the doctrinal and pastoral plan, It will be very difficult to pass, although it is customary to say that the worst, Unfortunately, there is no end.

.

From the island of Patmos, 1° May 2017 – Feast of St. Joseph the Worker

.

.

.

.

.

.

.