RESPONSE DUBIA CARDINALS? THE POPE RESPOND THROUGH schismatics Lefebvre …

.

The lack of law, replaced with the emotionality, sentimentality and the single arbitrariness, in addition to the lack of common sense, and sometimes also to the lack of common sense of the ridiculous, it is the best, but in some respects even worse response, that the four cardinals authors of dubia unfortunately likely to receive.

.

S. AND. Mons. Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo Titular Bishop of Laodicea Combusta

.

PDF print format article

.

the ruins of Laodicea Combusta cathedral church, Suffragan of the Diocese of Antioch

To all of you, Readers of this Johannine Patmos Island, site of the last revelation, where the Blessed Apostle wrote the Book of Revelation, my blessing and greetings of peace and grace from our Lord Jesus Christ.

.

In our Anatolian highlands the climate is mild enough, and among the four stones of the ruins of my old cathedral church is experiencing a rich spiritual fruits of Lent to the Easter Sunday.

.

Alcohol, Pastor tukmeno devoted to the Bishop of Laodicea Combusta with a group of sheep which he guided the Way of the cross directed by Bishop Laodicean

Friday I directed the Way of the cross, which they were attended by a large group of mountain sheep, me conducted by Arak, a Central Asian Turkmen pastor who is very devoted and which today protects by archeologists German poaching the ruins of my cathedral church burned many centuries ago, from this named my titular: Laodicea Combusta, or Laodicea the burnt.

.

After the Way of the cross the sheep I have kissed my hand one by one getting my Apostolic Blessing, after that, the Turkmen shepherd Arak, He has given built and sanctified by this pious exercise at their fold, while I immersed myself in my Apostolic loneliness, among the ruins visible of my church, to reflect on what is happening today in ancient Rome, increasingly reduced to ruin Invisible.

.

devout sheep on Way of the cross near the ruins of the Church of Laodicea Combusta

During my meditations solinghe Four of my Brother Bishops came to mind, the Cardinals Walter Brandmüller, Leo Burke, Carlo Caffarra and Joachim Meisner, I've always respected authentic men of God, and to whom I wish to donate my reflections about their Lenten Dubia [cf. WHO].

.

I want anzitutto to note Leading to my four brothers who as Bishop of Laodicea Combusta very much alive I keep a memory linked to the first apostolic times, because my office holder is a suffragan of the ancient Archdiocese of Antioch [cf. WHO], where is that, as told by the Blessed Apostolo Paolo in his Apostolic Letter to the Galatians [Gal 2,1-2.7-14], he proceeded to admonish and resume publicly Pietro, which he never questioned the authority, quite the opposite: a maximum protection of his apostolic authority considered right and good to show him the error and ambiguity in which he had fallen.

.

the Turkmen shepherd Arak, along with his gentle wife Shakira, Sheep in the company who meditate on the comments Way of the cross Bishop of Laodicea ignited

With these memories alive that are part of the ancient history of this land where the headquarters of my diocese, I especially prayed for this my brother bishops, to whom the Roman Pontiff can respond in various ways, more or less direct or indirect. In the particular case I think you are preparing to give them an indirect response, but no less comprehensive, thus resolving in a definitive way the problem generated by some ambiguity contained in the post-synodal document love joy.

.

Everybody knows the story not a little painful than fringe of schismatics Catholics and for this technically and canonically heretics, such are the followers of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre. This eminent prelate saw fit, to protect the deposit of the Catholic faith, rejecting the last Ecumenical Council of the Church. Of course, regarding this Council could discuss both on the properties of certain languages ​​it is of some vagueness or ambiguity. But always clear that it is one thing to discuss the obedience of faith, animated by the purpose that the Church - the one and only entitled to do - correct or supplement certain expressions, moreover, a pastoral council; Another car-elect account newly Atanasio di Alessandria and deny the authority of the Church. He said this is good to note, to all those who over time have compared Marcel Lefebvre to this Holy Father of the Church, that the Bishop of Alexandria never denied the Authority of the Church, but the defenses of heresy Arian bishops, certainly he did not fight against the Church; he accused of heresy bishops Arians, He not accused of heresy the Church's Magisterium.

.

the return of the sheep in their fold after having participated in the devotion of the Way of the Cross led by Bishop Laodicean

The great mistake of Lefebvre and all their followers, you believe and teach that the Second Vatican Council, having been pastoral, It is not binding. And if that's not enough, They found them and show well filled with heterodoxies, I am saying for decades ch'esso is steeped in modernist heresies. In tal modo, Lefebvre and their followers, They rise on the one hand to the judges of the purity of the faith, on the other hand to sole custodians of the one and true faith. All forget proudly at times disheartening, that the custody of the deposit of faith was not entrusted by Christ the Lord to them, but to the Church governed by the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles. I repeat, therefore, that Lefebvre, the current state, are schismatics and heretics, because anyone accuse me of heresy up the Magisterium of the Church, it is only for this heretic and outside the Catholic communion.

.

the schismatic act of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre: episcopal consecration of four bishops without a mandate of the Holy See. To open the video click on the image

Il Holy Pontiff John Paul II and later the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, It was very clear in pointing out that Lefebvre had to accept the teaching authority of the council and its texts without reservations. Following Benedict XVI did point out the special commission Ecclesia Dei, that the Lefebvre was not required to accept the interpretation of the Council - intended for the post-council - but the documents of his solemn magisterium. And with merciful mood, he went back to the four bishops consecrated by Marcel Lefebvre without papal mandate excommunication in which they were incurred, but pointing out that at the time, these bishops, and the Priests they consecrated, they had no role in the Catholic Church [cf. WHO]; nor could it, not being de facto in communion with the Catholic Church.

.

According to weeks when it is declared, it seems that the reigning Pontiff has passed the great rock of acceptance of the Magisterium of the Council, perhaps claiming to motu proprio after breakfast, talking to a reporter in the presence of a caretaker of Domus Sanctae Martha, that in each case, the so-called Lefebvrians, they are Catholic. And a few months you are talking to establish for them a personal prelature, with full recognition of the Holy See, without this I pose their conditions of any kind, from the unconditional acceptance of the high teaching of the Second Vatican Council.

.

schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay in a long interview in which he talks agreement unconditionally with the Holy See. To open the video click on the image

Once the Church had its own codified law. Since it hath gotten rid of this annoying smell of legalism, replaced in part by 'smell of sheep, in part by a mercy to be clarified, place one or the other thing can not give life or to the right do it yourself, nor to a right second-as-I-beat-the-little heart.

.

The Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X, Bishop Bernard Fellay, He has repeatedly stated in various interviews that now official, the agreement with Roma, it is in practice almost done and now "just missing the stamp" [see video interview WHO]. Well it is only right to point out - in case the stamp came seriously -, that this bishop is a heretic that fact as schismatic, but it is because it follows and transmits never disproved theories of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre who has always accused the council of liberal tendencies, illuministic and indifferentistiche, in conclusion: an authentic modernism receptacle. And here we remember that modernism, It was defined by Pope Pius X as the mother of all heresies through his Encyclical Feeding of Dominic's Sheep. That's what makes a heretic Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, Bishop Bernard Fellay, and their priests, well trained and ordained, undeterred by accusing the church of heresy, and they have remained heretics, then priests Valid ma illegal, when no role in the Catholic Church.

.

It seems that Lefebvre, declared motu proprio Catholic one morning after breakfast at the presence of the porter Domus Sanctae Martha, It will be granted a prelature, and thus legitimized by the Holy See to deny the Church's Magisterium, because apart from it, are, however, Catholic (!?).

.

the Messa Kika [“cohabitation“], one created by Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez in blatant defiance of the Eucharistic Sacrifice alive and saint of the Holy Catholic Mass, with preparation of restaurant table with bread and wine Copponi, from which then the Neocatechumenal receive the Eucharist sitting on chairs. You can see the Rito kikiano offertory clicking on the video.

The Reigning Pontiff, perhaps it aims to bring together, as in a vegetable soup that takes a single name - in this case the name of Catholic church instead of minestrone - all kinds of vegetable, including fennel, ingredients crucial to any kind of vegetable broth ecclesiastical. So what is obvious: soon we will find ourselves in a Church in which will have to live under the same roof: on the one hand the hotheads of Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez celebrating undeterred methodical Eucharist profanation with their celebrations Sui generis, the other no less rowdy Lefebvre ready to question the transubstantiation of the Eucharistic species for an involuntary formal error of the celebrant.

.

a Messa Kika presided at the center of house of Galilee (Israel) His Beatitude Patriarca Fouad Boutros Ibrahim Twal who breaks a Eucharistic loaf, then follows the breakage of bread while Kiko Arguello, advocate with its companion Carmen Hernadez similar abominations, sings. in front of these images, the question is simple: Who is so the Eucharist, really he believes in the real presence of Christ in the sacred Eucharistic species? To open the video click on the image.

On one hand, kikiani dancing to the sound of bongos around canteen staged on Saturday nights in any room to make cheerful Eucharist, the other to the Gregorian chants of Lefebvre with folded hands in unison. And inside the same soup contained in the one pot, Lefebvre will give sacrosanct right of heretics to kikiani, while i kikiani It will mothball the fragrant pre-conciliar to Lefebvre, but without having any reason for their part, Why …

.

… because it is undeniable, as well as commendable, that Lefebvre celebrate with sacred devotion Mass understood as Eucharistic Sacrifice, not as Feast of Friends around the table. On the contrary, a well-deserved honor of Lefebvre, I can add that continuing at this rate, within ten years, for the memory of how it was once the Catholic Mass, necessarily have to go to attend the celebrations made by the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, while in places of worship New Church merciful open to everything and everyone, especially to everything that is not Catholic, It will be all sorts of abomination, give her Eucaristie kikiane to the inter-denominational celebrations with heretics schismatics Lutherans and Anglicans.

.

schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay during a sacred celebration. It is unquestionable that Lefebvre is the authentic teaching of the Sacred Liturgy, animated certainly not as a mere formality, but as genuine and commendable devotion to the Eucharist. To open the video click on the image.

If the Lefebvrians, as they are and think, It will be granted a personal prelature, so the maximum canonical recognition by the Holy See, everything will be an indirect but clear response to my four bishops Brothers, that following the ancient apostolic tradition they have addressed the questions in the form of dubia, which could be followed by the fraternal correction that the Blessed Apostolo Paolo spoke to the Blessed Apostolo Pietro here in Antioch.

.

None of this will, however, need, there explain the reason: legitimating in this way and in this way the Lefebvrians, any individual bishop and every priest is free to accept or reject in an entirely legitimate parts of the Magisterium of the Church, he does not like.

.

the celebration of the Mass made by a priest of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. To open the video click on the image.

Simply said,: the problem of dubia, in this way it will decay before a response implicitly. If fact Lefebvre, who do not accept a full council of the Church, are Catholic, and may have their role and their status legal within the Church, what you want it to be, in their confrontation, refusing a simple post-synodal exhortation that hovers in some points of ambiguity?

.

.

For several decades it is disputed - although it should not be - what sanctions the Blessed Paul VI in his encyclical Human life. But even in this case the problem is solved, because basically it is just a single encyclical that contains very specific moral disciplines, Some will accept, others refuse. Where is the problem? In conclusion, the Humane Life, It contains only the moral disciplines binding, enshrines's not a dogma of faith! But most of all, which ecclesiastical authorities could ever recall Bishops, Individual priests or theologians? Because even in this case the answer is both simple and consistent: you have legitimized and given one status legal to Lefebvre who reject entirely the last council of the Church, in what capacity we recalled, instead not only we accept certain documents that we do not like, absolutely without putting into question any dogma of faith, as of the infallibility of the solemn magisterium of the Church?

.

celebration of Messa kika, usual set table, Wine Copponi, fraction of the loaves of bread often without any attention to the Eucharistic fragments … and all the appurtenances of “special rite” the Neocatechumenal conceived by Kiko and Carmen, including received Communion to sit in their seats. etc … To open the video click on the image.

Therefore, My dear Brother Bishops and Cardinals, wait with me, Please Anatolia that from these heights for you, that the Roman Pontiff really put this announced missing stamp the Lefebvrians. Then all doubts will fall, and any direct response from His Holiness will not be needed. And whoever it deems appropriate in conscience, will reject in toto or partly love joy, together with that encyclical that seems written to the delight of the ecologist left, the Laudato si, without any ecclesiastical authority, as Supreme Authority of the Church, I can say nothing to those who reject only some document, after it has been given full legitimacy and status legal to those who refuse and judges rather unorthodox and undermined the modernist heresies an entire council of the Church, and calls upon for decades to consider this, that means: one pastoral council and devoid of authority that contains within itself grave errors.

.

Non compliance with the law, replaced with the emotionality, sentimentality and the single arbitrariness, in addition to the lack of common sense, and sometimes also to the lack of common sense of the ridiculous, It is the best and in some respects even the worst response, Risk that you unfortunately receive.

.

schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay distributes Holy Communion to the faithful during a sacred celebration. To open the video click on the image.

Finally a clarification, because even if certain things you tend to take it for granted, it's good - especially these days -, do not take anything for granted common knowledge. For this precise that the definition of schismatic and as a logical consequence heretic given to Bishop Bernard Fellay, far from being a lack of respect towards him, is a statement that is part of the lexicon of ordinary theological disputes is both canonical. However, what will never be accused by these columns to this bishop and his priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, It is to be men without faith. Because they, in addition to being equipped with faith, They are also equipped with authentic, profound and commendable priestly piety, as indeed was the Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, which it was first model of human virtues and missionary bishop model.

.

Messa kika, Eucharistic Prayer. To open the video click on the image.

We can not however say the same with respect to whom the Holy Eucharist is the way document the videos between the texts of this article. Even more so it is stressed as mentioned earlier: continuing at this rate, the maximum within ten years, for the memory of how it was once the Catholic Mass, We should go to need to attend the celebrations made by the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, while in places of worship New Church merciful open to all and to all, especially to everything that is not Catholic, It will be all kinds of liturgical abomination.

.

.

from the ruins of the Church of Laodicea Combusta Cathedral

27 March 2017

.

.

In our priestly hearts, It remains the indelible memory of the Holy Mass celebrated by the Saints, who throughout his life have loved, served and obeyed the Church …

.

St. Pio of Pietrelcina, celebration of the Holy Mass. To open the video click on the image.

.

… instead, on this, really spread a veil.

.

Tribal dances Easter liturgy kika. To open the video click on the image.

.

.

On valuable suggestion of a priest reader, posthumously to the publication of this, insert, PDF study done by the Father Enrico Zoffoli the Neocatechumenal Way and published in 1991. You can read it by clicking below:

.

Enrico Zoffoli - "THE HERESIES OF THE NEOCATECHUMENAL WAY"

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

THE SECOND VATICAN CARDINAL WALTER KASPER, IN AN ARTICLE THAT IS ALL PROGRAM

.

We must recognize that some thesis doctrinal the council may appear ambiguous or have a certain modernist flavor, but this concern is dispelled by an appropriate interpretation, what it was the one made by post-conciliar Magisterium and authoritative theologians faithful to the Church.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Cardinal Walter Kasper

In an article on The Osservatore Romano the 12 April 2013 under the title A council still journeying, [text WHO] Cardinal Walter Kasper, one month and just over the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and the election of the reigning Pontiff, says Paul VI, in an attempt to prevent formulations proposed by a progressive majority that worried him, 'Involved' traditionalist minority allowing them to introduce changes in the drafting, that attenuated or mingled sense of modernizing steps.

.

If the Supreme Pontiff He felt compelled to moderate the intervention of these so-called "progressive", making room for traditionalists, means that he, with the aim of which was equipped with intuition, and with the sense of responsibility of the Successor of Peter, was aware of the plot in place and that these so-called progressives and bandied about were actually the cryptomodernists, that with their maneuvers risked contaminating the purity of the doctrine reconcile.

.

Blessed Paul VI in the chair during Vatican II

Paul VI was not a conservative and since when he was Archbishop of Milan showed appreciate a healthy modernization of the life of the Church and the Christian life, a need, this, intrinsic to Christianity itself, animated by the Holy Spirit who makes all things and leading the Church in history the fullness of truth. So if the "progressivism" of that most worried him, it means that it was a false promotion of the advancement of the faith and a reckless assumption of modernity.

.

Cardinal Walter Kasper It seems not to have grasped the wisdom and prudence of the Supreme Pontiff, today beatified, since it succeeds in asserting that with the intervention of the Pope, "he paid a price" with the "compromise formula, in which, often the majority of the positions are located immediately next to those of the minority, designed to delimit ". That means, if I understand the words of Cardinal, that the innovative thrust, According to him, It was held back by the Conservatives, so that it could not give everything he could give. But you have to wonder if these "conservatives" were not all the way in this circumstance the guardians of orthodoxy, Considering the importance given to them by Paul VI, who approved their amendments aimed at correcting the initiatives of the pro-modernist "progressives".

.

Paul VI in the apostolic visit to Venice, received by the Patriarch Albino Luciani, than in 1978 It will happen to the sacred throne with the name of Giovanni Paolo I

According to the author of this article that sounds almost like an implementation program for the immediate future, these "limitations", of which he speaks not modify the original texts of all "progressive", that is - let's say it frankly - modernist, but they left them intact, limiting a star beside them in incongruous and contradictory way, implying offensively against Paul VI's inability to reconcile the Council Fathers.

.

The article goes on to explain - and this follows logically from what the author has said - that, because of these "compromise formula", "The conciliar texts have in them an enormous potential for conflict; They open the door to a selective reception in either direction ».

.

In this article, Cardinal also declares that "not even the official reception has been stationary. Partly, It exceeded the Council ", as if to say, apparently, that the Council orthodox and modernist statements are next to each other, as if the reader could then choose the ones you prefer, unless it is put on a contradictory position giving a blow to the rim and a barrel.

.

Paul VI with Cardinal Karol Woytila, than in 1978 He will succeed Giovanni Paolo I by the name of Giovanni Paolo II

In that consists This "way" of the council according to the author? It seems the path of a drunk who now hangs here now hangs beyond: interpretation totally disrespectful and tendentious, that one is surprised that it has been hosted in a prestigious newspaper like The Osservatore Romano, which by its nature should reflect in an objective and impartial way, the supremely papal teachings, clarifying or defending positions possibly, especially if it is a question of such an important event as the Second Vatican Council and the part that it was Blessed Pope Paul VI.

.

With all due respect this well-known and influential Cardinal, what is the Cardinal Walter Kasper, for twenty years he was head of the Department for Ecumenism and enjoys great reputation as a scholar Christology, I must say that I differ markedly from this interpretation that he gives the conciliar doctrines, interpretation that negates the evidence continuity with Tradition, thing that all the Popes, by John XXIII to Benedict XVI, They have insistently maintained, to limit ourselves only to remember the famous formula of Benedict XVI "progress in continuity", from which I drew the title of one of my in-depth study on the subject, I allow myself to alert the reader [1].

.

Paul VI requires the cardinal's hat to the Archbishop of Monaco of Bavaria Joseph Ratzinger, It will happen in 2005 to Giovanni Paolo II

Serious thing, in summary, It is that Cardinal Walter Kasper seems to insinuate that between the doctrines of the Council will still have infiltrated certain theses neomoderniste that Paul VI wanted to prevent, but to which you would be resigned to leaving juxtaposed to those Orthodox to "price" of "an enormous potential for conflict".

.

It is the same false reading which it calls made by Bishop Marcel Lefèbvre, because in hindsight extremes meet. All with a difference: while the Cardinal Walter Kasper welcomes it as a "progress" or "road", Bishop Marcel Lefebvre sorry it as a denial of Tradition. But the mistake of the two is common: see the Council a modernism that does not exist, rejecting the explanations put forward by all the popes of the post-conciliar.

.

Paul VI in his chair gestatoria, of which he used for the last time Giovanni Paolo I

It must be acknowledged that some thesis doctrinal the council may appear ambiguous or have a certain modernist flavor; but this concern is dispelled by an appropriate interpretation, what it was the one made by post-conciliar Magisterium and authoritative theologians faithful to the Church.

.

Insist, as some do, in the belief that the council contains steps modernist equivalent to think that a Council can be wrong when it comes to issues pertaining to faith and morals. Which for a Catholic does not make sense, although it is true that the Council does not contain new solemnly defined dogma. Questionable if anything could be some directions pastoral, where the Church certainly is not foolproof, but still worthy of high regard.

.

The thesis of Cardinal Walter Kasper, according to which the doctrines of the Council would lead to a simple juxtaposition undisguised or patched between opposing contradictory thesis, traditional and modernist, It is absolutely unsustainable, because it would be tantamount to accusing the council of heresy, given the heretical nature of modernism; and what would be the sign that Paul VI was unable to still prevent the presence of modernism in the Council, that much and rightly worried him, though he was not at all a notoriously conservative backwater.

.

Paul VI, It served lunch to the children winners of the competition for the most beautiful crib, 30 January 1966

If the council has a pastoral style and not a defining tone even in the dogmatic teachings, this does not authorize anyone to take them lightly, denying their infallibility, because in judging the authority of the Church's teaching you should not care so much come but he teaches what teaches.

.

The formal definition is a rare mode magisterial teaching, why you should not use the pretext of the fact that this style is lacking in the Council, for error accuse or modernism or rupture with Tradition. Even when Christ was teaching in a boat or sitting at the table with her and not in the temple, it was always the Word of God accepted in faith.

.

It is true that Paul VI, after Good Pope John XXIII, He allowed the Council the presence of Karl Rahner and others criptomodernisti. He was right? It hurt? It is difficult to judge. He's still the fact that, as it is clear from the studies that have been done on the contribution of these experts, they offered an innovator in the assembly reconcile contribution but substantially in the limits of orthodoxy. And how could it be otherwise?

.

Paul VI, 7 December 1965, closing act of Vatican II

It is after the Council that Rahner, with surprising boldness, unfortunately without being censored by the Ecclesiastical, He gave vent undisturbed and with great cunning to his modernist trends. But since he had already acquired a world-class, even among the bishops, even the Pope had to make the best of a bad situation.

.

We must point out that it is true that at the Council there was a clash between a reactionary traditionalism and modernism crypto, He paludava progressive appearance, to get a pass; but it must also say that this comparison - that in some circumstances took on a harsh tone, dramatic and deeply worried Paul VI -, He ended, thank God, Rated with final agreements to very wide majorities and certain tone progressive. The Council was a great innovation council, ma absolutely modernist, who feared the Pope, who he was known in the progressive line but maritainiana absolutely not at all favorable to modernism, which is notoriously a heresy condemned by St. Pius X.

.

Speaking therefore "enormous potential for conflict" It is very serious offense against the supernatural wisdom of the doctrines of the Council, we were almost in front of politicians pateracchi or conflicts of the Hegelian dialectic, and it is therefore completely misunderstand the balanced and consistent results of the conciliar debates, where is that, thanks to the assistance of the Holy Spirit, the fathers, come to a fraternal agreement, They were able to offer us a more advanced knowledge of the Word of God without any breakage or unthinkable contradiction with previous doctrinal heritage the Council.

.

Paul VI, receive for free a white dove

Find here the contradictions It means disregard the root of wisdom and nobility of these doctrines, true light for our times, signal indicators of the way that today should the Church do to confront the modern thought and increase the number of his children. So this is not to do any 'reception selective in either direction », but to take one direction, with obvious possibility of particular choices, resulting from the harmonious confluence of fidelity and progress: the one we just mentioned by the Council documents in their authentic interpretation, that the Popes of the post-conciliar do not get tired from fifty to propose to the whole Church for the good and progress of the Church and all people of good will.

.

Those who believe they have to choose in the Council between traditionalism and criptomodernismo he has understood nothing of the teaching of the Council and it is only a proponent of divisions within the Church.

.

Paul VI, image of seniority, year 1977

The official reception of the Council certainly he not remained stagnant and in some ways exceeded the Council, but not in the sense understood by Cardinal Walter Kasper, ie oscillating between two opposing thesis and leaving choose from time to time between the one and the other depending on the conveniences, but rather deepening this wise synthesis of modernity and tradition.

.

I do not know what this interpretation the council given by Cardinal Walter Kasper, that seems made to stoke the flames of controversy between opposing extremists, can serve for the dialogue between believers, which however he has devoted himself so zealously for so many years. Le dottrine dei Council, as it says the same word council: reconcile, have always had in the Church is an important pacifying and conciliatory function; and the last Council, if well interpreted and well understood, It is not called in this providential function.

.

19 October 2014, the tapestry found in the central loggia of the Papal Archbasilica St. Peter's for the beatification of Pope Paul VI

Of course, the Magisterium of the Church Today also is in motion, but not to deny the truth of faith previously taught, but rather to guide us in a motherly and infallibly to an ever deepening his elder in the tradition and with an eye to including more advanced on the path to the kingdom of God and the fullness of truth.

.

In some ways some indications of the Council they are overcome, But not to have been abandoned, but in the sense that they lived better and more devoutly according to the new situations that did not exist at the time of the Council, but of course always in continuity with the unchanging heritage of faith that Christ offered once for all to the Church to be transmitted intact to all mankind until the end of time.

.

Varazze, 22 March 2017

.

.

___________________________

[1] PROGRESS IN CONTINUITY. THE QUESTION OF THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL AND postcouncil, Faith&Culture, Verona 2011.

.

.

.

Dear Readers,

every now and remember to support our apostolic and theological work with your valuable offerings.

Thank you!

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

— defend the Pope from false friends —

ENZO BIANCHI AND VIOLINO tzigano : THE FALSE PROPHETS AND THEIR harping THE POPE

.

As for the Pope personally and merciful liberator, this is a different matter. Of course, He has made many significant gestures toward the poor, the exploited, the little ones, the marginalized, families wounds, seniors, the sick, immigrants; but one may wonder how much mercy towards the faithful disturbed and shocked by the heretics, by modernists and false prophets, or if no exchange for mercy excessive benevolence towards enemies of the Church, or how much mercy - or whether there is mercy - in some of his interventions towards people, prelates, theologians or institutions altogether worthy and faithful to the Church, maybe for a long time.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

.

PDF print format article

.

Beware of false prophets

Mt 7,15

.

.

Pietro, beware of false prophets …

In this daily race to those who shoot biggest by many and influential members of the Episcopate and the Roman Curia, Fathers de The Island of Patmos They have initiated the heading 'Defending the Holy Father from the bad friends ", dedicated to refute a number of well-known modernists, that, for some time, you are going, with serratus pace, on the catwalk their offer from the big mass media, to work on the demolition of the Church. This time is to turn Enzo Bianchi, interviewed by Bruno Quaranta it The Print the 14 last February [see text interview WHO]. These characters seem to have agreed among themselves a plan to flatter and exploit the Pope in a sneaky way for novice, but blatant for experts, to which the Catholic faithful to the Pope, which opens our eyes to these maneuvers, Test outrage and revulsion at such flattery, that do nothing but damage the venerable person of the Holy Father, from their exalted so immoderate, as did the courtiers of the ancient oriental empires.

.

Central point in the interview is the comparison that makes Bianchi between the present Pope John Paul II and St.. The basis for comparison is the most important and delicate issue of freedom. We know we Catholics what is precious to us freedom. It is the vocation of the Christian: "Brothers, you were called to freedom " [Gal 5,13]. But now here is the clarification: « […] provided that this freedom as an excuse for self-indulgence, but through love be servants of one another " [v.13]. So you will understand how difficult and delicate, which firmness and prudence of judgment criteria, how much delicacy of judgment, how much information, how many checks, how much prudence, that discernment, how many clarifications are necessary, to judge a Pope in relation to the great, vital question of freedom, so closely tied to the fate of man, the history of the Church and to the very essence of Christianity.

.

Enzo Bianchi visited the Supreme Pontiff Giovanni Paolo II

Enzo Bianchi, instead, does not find any difficulty to categorize categorically, sharp, with the utmost ease and the most incredible oversimplification, on the subject of freedom, the whole figure and story of two Popes, Saint John Paul II and the current, with them in opposition to one another in a dramatic and radical way; the first, stuck in the total negativity: 'Closing in the Church, Waterproof what was at liberty ", therefore, a dictator of the stack of Stalin, Hitler or Ivan the Terrible; The second one, raised to the stars: "With him freedom was reconciled with the Church", as if before Pope Francis freedom in the Church did not exist. I wonder if Pope Francis phoned Bianchi begging him not to say such nonsense.

.

These two outputs on the relationship of the two Popes with freedom denote Bianchi in the complete lack of discretion in judging two great personalities, which are two Popes, of which one is a saint canonized, who is offended by an insult of extreme gravity, which could not throw the worst of the Masons or Communists, while the other, still alive, He can not, in his humility and his sense, do not feel embarrassed at being put, still alive, on top of a Holy Pontiff, and he can not but have found it extremely unpleasant, and offensive misplaced praise so effusive, who forgets that freedom has no need to "be reconciled with the Church", this being, under the leadership of the Pope and every Pope, free yourself, by own account and teacher of freedom for all mankind, until the end of the world.

.

Enzo Bianchi on a visit to the Holy Father Benedict XVI

If Bianchi believes that freedom is never been separated from the Church or in contrast with the Church, yes it may have been necessary to "reconcile" with the Church, it means that he does not know what freedom is or has a Masonic concept or liberal and believes that the Church should learn freedom from masonry or by liberalism, Therefore, his is a wrong concept of freedom. Because on the contrary, true freedom is only one taught and practiced by the Church. If there can be a freedom that is reconciled with the Church, It will be the false freedom that becomes true listening to Christian teaching on freedom and imitating the Christian practice of freedom. A Church without freedom does not exist, although it may exist Christians who do not live the freedom of God's children.

.

Enzo Bianchi contradicts, when it denies that St. John Paul II has been a promoter of freedom, while he is recognizing the merit of his hostility to communism and its openness to ecumenical dialogue. On the first point, Bianchi completely ignores which wrestler was by Pope John Paul II and before becoming Pope, against communist tyranny for freedom of the Church, of his homeland and of humanity itself. Concerning the second point, it is clear that ecumenical dialogue is the sum expression of religious freedom.

.

Freedom promoted by John Paul II in the Church was true freedom, founded on zeal for the sound doctrine, for it is the truth that makes us free [CF Jn. 8,32]. Like this, If on the one hand, with the help of the brave Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Pope has forcefully defended the doctrine of the faith against several errors insurgents, on the other he has left us the powerful encyclical The Splendor of Truth, in which the great Pontiff proposes, against the other, a large teaching on Christian freedom in his relationship with the moral act, conscience, the moral law, virtue and vice, the grace, the Word of God and the ultimate end.

.

Enzo Bianchi in St. Peter's Square pays tribute to Pope Benedict XVI

It makes you wonder according to which the concept of freedom Bianchi dares to speak, about San Giovanni Paolo II, of 'closure in the Church, Waterproof what was at liberty ". He obviously does not refer to that freedom which the Pope described in The splendor of truth, relying on which he ruled the Church, and therefore he rejected the freedom of Bianchi, that Paul would have called "the flesh" [Gal 5,13]. And as it is reckless on the one hand - as well as wicked, being a saint - the judgment of Bianchi of St. John Paul II, just as it is reckless in the opposite direction and blatant sycophantic it is the judgment on the Pontiff, which undoubtedly it is against the closure and intellectual conformism, to self-righteous legalism and a rigid traditionalism, He is attentive to religious freedom and conscience, the liberation of the poor and oppressed, to the freedom of the children of God, open to the newness of the Spirit, sensitive to cultural and religious pluralism, all’ecumenismo, to dialogue, the elasticity and flexibility of choices, attentive to concrete cases, the area of ​​freedom against the law.

.

It would be ridiculous consider Pope Francis short such as "reconciling freedom with the Church", as if the Church of John Paul II has been in conflict with the freedom, false claim, unjust and blasphemous towards the Church and previous Popes, falsehoods understandable on the lips of a Mason or a liberal or a Mazzini or a communist, but certainly not a Catholic monaco, let alone a prophet, which Bianchi passes to be at many.

.

The fact of the limits realize in which the Pope is the organizer of freedom in the Church, I feel like the more reason to express our filial devotion and desire to be close to him in trials and to help, defend it and support it, for what it is in us, in his service to the universal Church and to humanity. Hiding his brother his faults, real or apparent, was also the Pope, to launch themselves recklessly into hyperbolic and ridiculous flattery, how does Bianchi, It is not true respect, It is not frank, It is not obedience, It is sincerity, is not charity, It is not confidence, It is not trusted, It is mercy, It is not co, is no faithfulness, especially when the same judgment criteria, as in the case of Bianchi, They are not taken from the Gospel, but by the worldly spirit. Well, if the Pope of course, as Pope, in assistance of the Holy Spirit, can not fail to have correct ideas, on freedom, instead, as a pastor and man of government, It is not protected from faults due to his human frailty. For he shows too lenient and almost shy into the modernists, repressive and vice versa, too severe, towards the traditionalists. The first leaves them too free, so they take the opportunity to cause great harm to the Church; others restrict freedom, taking unused or even suppressing healthy forces, which could otherwise be productively employed for the good of the Church. Interestingly, in a recent ecumenical meeting, dad, asked for an opinion on Luther, he has sent to Cardinal Walter Kasper, confessing candidly "afraid" of him, how could a schoolboy before the master.

.

Enzo Bianchi pays tribute to Pope Francis I, shortly after his election to the sacred throne

Rightly the Pope it was proposed to carry forward the reforms of Vatican II; but too-good is an increased tendency of the Council, when instead, after fifty years in which we experienced the damage that the feel-good trend brings to the Church, It feels more and more the need, without renouncing to the greater understanding of the mercy made by the Council, to restore or find or rediscover, without useless nostalgia for a past that has passed, the educational function, liberating and corrective discipline human and divine, as well as clarity, steadfastness and firmness of the principles of reason and faith, of dogma and morality. Dad, instead, Unfortunately, paradoxically, It seems to want to impose by force gooders. So there are now Superiors, pedestrian followers of the Pope, to punish those who support the existence of the divine punishment.

.

Freedom has certainly disciplined and governed by the law, to avoid the anarchy and individualistic gooders, relativist and liberale dell 'one man Wolf. In fact, doing good is the worst enemy of goodness and therefore of freedom. Freedom has built in freedom and if, in serious cases, We must resort to coercion, this must always be done to defend and promote freedom.

.

Enzo Bianchi and Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini

You see that the Pope He received a liberal education, perhaps Rahner; whereby, if it has no difficulty to appreciate the freedom, the concrete, becoming, the modern, the new, the progress and the historicity, It is hard to appreciate, obviously repulsion, the abstract values, immutable, universal, absolute and traditional. Moreover, the Pope himself, many signs and facts, Apparently not fully free to bring forth the fullness of its apostolic faculty; but one gets the impression that it is surrounded by intrusive and intriguing collaborators, which, for their false obedience to the Pope and contradictions with the Pope's duties, seem to, rather than being the subject of a free choice of the Pope, themselves be, with diabolical arts and who knows what false promises, to impose itself, or maybe they are imposed on him by cunning and powerful foreign forces, harmful to the Church and to the Pope himself, probably Freemasonry, which shows benevolent towards the Pope to buy credit and trick him better, waiting to strike when they have made it weaker. They, moreover, who often speaks of the devil, must have an inkling of what, but probably he does not know how to get rid.

.

Difficult to know how much freedom Pope moves and how much he is instead held back by obscure or obvious harmful forces, outwardly obsequious, but enemy covertly. But this anomalous situation of a helpless Papacy, hostage of fake friends, It has been dragging on since the time of Blessed Pope Paul VI, whose doldrums, omissions, inadvertencies, naivety, excessive concern, prevarications, hesitations, incapacity and weaknesses, They were not due to true faults, because it was a saint, but its human objective limits, of whom have taken advantage wickedly dark conspirators, Evil characters and smart collaborators, relying on a mass of believers in their faith weakened and disoriented, prey of those wolves in sheep.

.

Enzo Bianchi during a conference, to his left, the Secretary General of the Italian Episcopal Conference S.It is. Mons. Nunzio Galantine

She was historical, for instance, the disappointment of Paul VI for the Cardinal betrayal Léon-Joseph Getting sick, first much appreciated by him; e, for another example, he realized too late the combined trouble in the liturgy by Bishop. Annibale Bugnini. So too, deceived by rahneriani, He never thought to condemn Karl Rahner, while this would be the right time. He got wind of only minimal heresies of Edward Schillebeeckx, who treated him with much regard. Only Saint John Paul II tried to remedy, but could only partially, because he did not have the support of the Dominican Order.

.

Because of this, in regulating the exercise of freedom in the Church, Pope Francis is struggling to implement justice, and consequently also affects the exercise of mercy, as well as so much at heart, the fact that the mercy supposed to recognize the merits of others with justice, especially if we are in authority, supporting and rewarding the good and combating the evil. Only then the merciful acts by lifting the weak and forgiving to repentant. But the rebels unrepentant, which they may wish the divine favors, without changing their perverse will, they themselves to continue to be punished. In these cases it is not God who is "perverted", as it would like Bianchi: it is they who are perverse.

.

Enzo Bianchi in the cathedral with the then Archbishop of Palermo, Cardinal Paolo Romeo

In their false judgment on the Pope, White seems to present the Holy Father as a liberalone permissive on the line by Marco Pannella and Emma Bonino. Ma, if we meditate carefully on its crude paean to the Pope: "With him freedom was reconciled with the Church", I have already commented, and the words that immediately follow, then we find his game. In fact, let us pause on these words and valutiamone weight. Hence the big white shoots, as if what he said was not enough. But now we understand what he means. For he says that Pope Francis would "craftsman of gestures until recently inconceivable '. there, so, il eschatological myth and fantapolitico Pope revolutionary that appeals to Eugenio Scalfari, that in reality, of the pope, He did not understand anything. Or the Pope, according to the Communists, He is coagulating in the world all the forces of the left, hope of Castro Cuban and Argentine revolutionary, Terror of the American capitalists.

.

To me seventy-five, I experienced the famous Sixty-eight when I was a student at the University of Bologna, where I studied before taking the vocational path to the ministerial priesthood and religious life, It seems to be back in those days, as if by then the story had not gone on, and as if the calamitous implementation, in the decades of the ideas of those fanatics excited, it was plain for all. But the thing hilarious is that these dangerous lingered considering Progressives and the reformers of the Church, perhaps taking Luther to model and interpreter of Vatican II! Here then the shouts of joy of the poor masses manipulated by the various Bianchi: "A Pope so he never saw!», "Finally the Pope that we like!», "The Pope of all!"And bales of this kind, just that these bales are taken out of many naive, deceived by the modernists, who would like to present a chameleon and modernist Pope, and many take the bait or to cry or to dance.

.

Enzo Bianchi again in the Cathedral of Palermo with the new Archbishop S.It is. Mons. Corrado Lorefice, who invited him to speak shortly after his election to the bishopric

But in what consist these "gestures until recently inconceivable '? I do not think Bianchi think here when the Pope went solo optician in town to be repaired glasses or confessed a boy in St. Peter's Square, or when we have seen no red shoes. It must be something more serious and important to Bianchi, namely 'gestures' that until Pope Bergoglio seemed inconceivable, and that instead the Pope has put in place. Now, what becomes "conceivable" with the current Pope and that before, it seems from time immemorial, "inconceivable", White does not specify, ma, looking at the context and in particular to his ideas about freedom and what it says on the subject for each of the two Popes, you can well imagine.

.

What are these gestures who will remain in the history of future centuries? The answer does not seem difficult, and is obtained by referring to the comparison that makes Bianchi between the two popes on freedom and his ideas on freedom: it follows that for Bergoglio Bianchi overthrew the traditional Wojtyla idea of ​​freedom, replacing the real one in place as part of a Church illiberal, authoritarian and despotic over the centuries and perhaps millennia. But given that St. John Paul II, holy as it was, It is instead a great teacher and heroic witness of freedom, that consequently it is? That the good Bianchi, prophet amateur, opposing foolishly on freedom St. John Paul II to the present Pope, It is logical to attribute to them a false concept of freedom, believing what cheer the Pope sensational or rediscoverers discoverer of Christian freedom.

.

With this gigantic bluster, Bianchi makes in what the Pope a good service? Or everything is resolved in a painful buffoonery, humiliating and offensive to the same Pope Francis, that will have made you a great laugh, but not without bitterness, to note how far can drop his child, however, not devoid of spiritual gifts?

.

Enzo Bianchi holds a retreat to the clergy of the Archdiocese of Siena in the seminary Archbishop, currently closed for lack of vocations

But here then the rub; we understand why the judgments of Bianchi on two Popes, so that he discovers his game. Bianchi, when he is rejecting the traditional concept of freedom catholic up to Pope Bergoglio, It can not help but fall just in the carnal conception - today we would say liberal - Freedom, that St. Paul excludes and condemns [Gal 5,13], ending up making the Pope say what is absolutely foreign to his thought of Teacher of the Faith. And with that I remember The condemnation of the liberal conception of freedom it is now standing: We find in the teachings of Blessed Pius IX and Leo XIII's encyclical freedom praestantissinmum the 1888. This conception, It originated from the Lutheran subjectivism and anthropocentrism Renaissance, the culmination or extreme idealism consequences of Hegel, jogging human freedom even to the divine: "The will wills itself». This pantheistic conception is taken from Rahner, harshly criticized by Ratzinger in his book Principles of Catholic Theology [CF. Who are you, Paris 1982, pp.187-188]. It is that freedom, about which Emanuel Mounier, honest leftist Catholic thirties and friend of Maritain, proclaimed, remained in a famous political philosophy program: "We must free up the freedom by the liberals'. This freedom has nothing to do with true Christian freedom, in obedience to the Magisterium of the Church, freedom that is based on truth cf. GV 8,32] and it is within the law, the freedom that does not give any space to "conflicts", but that is the climate of their solution, freedom that knows to avoid them in charity and mutual acceptance, however, giving rise to a legitimate pluralism and a peaceful confrontation of opinions, in the unity of the only freely shared and common truth of faith, in full communion with the Church and obedience to the legitimate Pastors.

.

The opposition that Bianchi would like to find between St. John Paul II and the Holy Father Francis in theme and practice of freedom, It is totally false. Either freedom is jointly responsible and effective freedom of choice, as well as the gift of God, that is grace and mercy. Saint John Paul II further accentuated the metaphysical bases, rational and dogmatic freedom, which it is the highest expression of ecclesial communion, created by the Holy Spirit. A Pope Francis are rather more to heart the dynamism and creativity of freedom, as a privileged expression of the person created in the image of God and moved by the Holy Spirit, the service of others, especially the poorest and most suffering.

.

Enzo Bianchi holds a conference in the cathedral of Arezzo, to his right, the Bishop of the City S.It is. Mons. Riccardo Fontana

There is no doubt that the insistence with which Pope Francis presented the Christian as a man of mercy, It has a close relationship with the ideal of freedom. Actually, the Merciful is a liberator: liberator from the miseries of the body and spirit, deliverer from the power of Satan. The right, instead, Reward the merits, up to take away your freedom to criminals. As for the Pope personally and merciful liberator, this is a different matter. Of course, He has made many significant gestures toward the poor, the exploited, the little ones, the marginalized, families wounds, seniors, the sick, immigrants; but one may wonder how much mercy towards the faithful disturbed and shocked by the heretics, by modernists and false prophets, or if no exchange for mercy excessive benevolence towards enemies of the Church, or how much mercy - or whether there is mercy - in some of his interventions towards people, prelates, theologians or institutions altogether worthy and faithful to the Church, maybe for a long time.

.

The interviewer then attempts to dig deeper the soul of Bianchi and here we come to discover the root of his theological liberalism: a "change in the idea of ​​God", practically … from the bad to the good God God (!?). In fact, says Bianchi: "In my formative years God stood out as a judge, severe. A face that gradually I will appear perverse. Jesus Christ is the only God narration. I could not believe in God without Christ ". And from these words we see how White has embraced misericordismo fideist of Lutheran origin. His spiritual path is similar to that of Luther: He started from a God who rebuked him for his sins, the God "severe" and "punishing" the Old Testament, It began to try impatience, and to appear to "perverted"; so, to be "free", without too many worries or guilt senses, She has imagined and fashioned a good God and tender, which would be the God of the New Testament, sweet and "merciful", forgiving, Jesus Christ, that excuses everything, He does not punish, and has already promised Paradise. It deals with, in essence, the ancient heresy of Marcion. It does not appear that Luther was aware. But the fact remains.

.

Enzo Bianchi holds a conference of the ambo of Padua Cathedral

As it forced the image bianchiana the God of the Old Testament, equally so is that of the goodness of Jesus Christ, all and only mawkish tenderness, completely rammollito, how those quilts, that, if they are struck by a punch, the fist sinks without resistance. With the God of the Old Testament do not mess. Instead with "good" God of the New, for those who offend, there are no unpleasant consequences: You have always forgiven. Here then is the Christ who imagines Bianchi is not the real one, ma, wanting to give an opinion psychoanalytic, It is the dream of childish child who wants to do his pranks without being punished by his father. I remember that when I was in elementary school, there were of my Compagnucci naughty or "bad companions", to use the language of Savonarola, for which the teachers "good" ones were not punished, while the others were the "bad".

.

The feel-good Christology today is the expression academically pompous, with quotes from Bultmann, Rahner and Luther, a psyche remained stagnant at that level of mental and emotional development. At this airhead Christology and gelatinous corresponds to a Mariology easy-going and sweetish, in which Our Lady "merciful" is one of those moms "modern", that satisfy the unique son in all his whims, They not ever make the slightest warning or the slightest correction, they may grow "free" and "make their own choices". But they come out of the frustrated intolerant, as some theologians and bishops of our days.

.

Enzo Bianchi at a conference on the liturgy in Gubbio, to his right the Bishop S.It is. Mons. Claudio Maniago, at the time the archdiocese of Florence

In fact the God of the Gospel is more severe than the God of Moses, and this is quite logical, precisely because the God of Christ is the most merciful of God to Moses. Indeed, while the God of the Old Testament prophets only sends simple, the God of the New Testament Father sends us His own Son to make us children of God and to die on the cross for us. As a result, Christian ethics is more demanding [cf. Mt 5, 20-43], just because, as ethics of God's children, the image of Christ, It is the ethics of those who, being the subject of greater mercy, that is quickened and strengthened by a more grace, and more enlightened by the truth, They are bound to a 'greater justice' [cf. Mt 5,20], to greater virtues - charity - and best good works - works of mercy - , although it is true that Christianity, doing better know human weakness, He teaches a greater mercy, tolerance and understanding towards others. But at the same time, the Gospel, showing better the secrets of the human heart, makes us better know the malice of sin, so it is more severe towards the sinner. Hence the severe, but salutary warning of the Letter to the Hebrews: "brothers, if we sin willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth ", that is, the Gospel, "There remains no more sacrifice for sins", ie the divine worship becomes useless hypocrisy, "But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation which shall devour the adversaries", nothing but mercy! "When someone has violated the law of Moses, He is put to death without mercy on the word of two or three witnesses. Then a much worse punishment do you think will be the one who has trampled the Son of God, considers unclean the blood of the Covenant, from which he was consecrated, and insults the spirit of grace?» [EB 10, 26-29]. And this also happens in human relationships. Indeed, if I show myself to someone more kind and merciful than with other, maybe I will not have reason to be waiting for that person a greater appreciation and, consequently, feel more offended, if such recognition does not reach or even that person repays me with ingratitude and contempt?

.

the … “Dad” Enzo Bianchi

In these theologies of God "bad", There is confusion between the concept of punishment and that of cruelty. Missing the true concept of punishment, so you can not distinguish a just punishment of an unjust punishment. The punishment as such is always injustice, cruelty, violence or revenge and rancorous. There is the idea of ​​punishment as restoration of violated justice, but as retaliation by the injured party, as to unleash a litany of hatreds and vendettas without end. No questions are asked about who of the two contenders is right, why do not you believe in an objective truth, absolute and universal. The truth is what I think. The judge in the same court is not seen as an arbitrator, representative of a common law and equal for all, but as the enemy that haunts us. And the same divine judgment is seen as, as he confesses candidly Bianchi. The important thing is to respond tit for tat according to "own" truth. And this dialectic without end, damn and hell, It is even applied in the relationship between man and God. Man feels a Prometheus, innocent victim of a jealous and vengeful God, that, with its punishments and earthquakes, would make him afraid, crush his freedom and make his slave. And these conceptions are those that, He protests with the desire for peace, of Christian meekness and "forgiveness", do not allow any distinction between just war and unjust war, between righteous anger and unjust anger, between the offender and the assault of police officer, and to reduce violence, hatred or injustice any form military virtues, of bravery, coercion or use of force.

.

It is clear that if we were to strictly the requirements of this hypocritical and cowardly pacifism, should dissolve the armed forces, the Carabinieri, the Guardia di Finanza and the Alpine Corps, abolish prisons, destroy the code of canon law, as did Luther, and many other forces and institutions such, while the court order would look like the system of evil and the same referees football matches would be abolished. The same is true of punishment and divine justice. But - so thinks Bianchi together with all the do-gooders -, since God is good, Dio non earn, but he approves or forgive everything I do and I like. But we must say that God promises us yes mercy, but only if we discount our faults. The prophets announce us a just and merciful God. Angry or offended in front of the warnings of the prophets, It is foolish and, far from attracting the divine mercy, l'increases anger. Wise thing however is to do penance as did the inhabitants of Nineveh at the preaching of Jonah. Indeed it is only by striving to avoid sin with holy fear of God, accepting from God, humbly, serenely and confidently, trials and punishments as factors of repair and purification, that we are preparing to receive God's mercy and to enter into intimacy with God, as St. Augustine says: "To be filled, you must first empty. You must be filled with good and so you have to free yourself from evil. Suppose that God wants to fill you with honey " (here is mercy). "If you are full of vinegar, where will you put the honey? You have to free the vessel from that which contained, indeed it must be cleaned. Maybe you have to clean it with hard work and commitment, if needed, it is suitable to receive anything » [cf.Treaties Objection Letter of Saint John, Treat. 4,6; PL 2008-2009]. Here is the ascetic function, here is the purifying function of the misfortunes and punishments, what St. John of the Cross called "passive purifications" and of which the "prophet" Bianchi, like Luther, It does not seem to know anything or have horror, why would enjoy immediately and low price of the mystical, without the proper preparation consisting confident acceptance of divine justice.

.

the winning combination: Enzo Bianchi and Luigi Ciotti …

In gooders like Bianchi but it lacks the concept of punishment or penalty as an expression of the human and divine justice. They do not seem to understand that it is good and right that evildoers suffer to counterbalance or even, how do you say, for "retaliation", that same evil that he did - "who does, the aspects "-, so that the sinner himself, although unwillingly, It is reported in the order, in which consists the penalty or punishment. The delinquent contracts a debt to justice, you must pay. Indeed, Justice must compensate, return, restore order, back in its place that is out of place and make it right [Right in German, right in English] or straighten what is wrong. Thus justice reward merit, repair the wrong done, It gives the offended satisfaction, take away the evil of disorder, but it may be the just penalty. The mercy, as well as remove the clutter, It removes the guilt and punishment. So justice is a balance, one to equalize, a balance, not lean either to one side or the other, without partiality, no sense of people, without favoritism, but recognizing to each their own right and on its own merit (to each his own), with balance and fairness. This means the balance icon, we see the statue of Justice in our courts.

.

The undeniable fact that in this life often innocent people are affected by calamities, while criminals get away, creates doubts about divine justice. But we must consider three things: first, that the same disorder in the distribution of the penis is a consequence of original sin. Second, that divine justice commands but to human justice, Civil and ecclesiastical right to administer justice, but unfortunately, because of the consequences of original sin or error or judges sins, human justice is faulty. Third, God does not always immediately punish the evildoers, because he wants to give them time to repent [cf. Is 30,18; Sap 12,19; Pt II 3,9]. But if they continue in sin, comes sooner or later, one way or another, showdown, which can also result in the punishment of hell. God forgets, when he forgives; but remember, when it has to punish.

.

"Hell Dancing ', Nietzsche. And so it is for Whites? And here it is good to make a short speech on this topic. Bianchi, moved by the divine mercy, assures us: "I will sing your mercy, even from hell '. I believe that in Hell there is little to sing. And if I can imagine some singing, certainly it will not be the choirs of angels represented in the frescoes by Fra Angelico, and absolutely repugnant to me that the White singing can be a hymn to divine mercy, given that one is damned just because he hates God's mercy and believed not to have any need, since, in his opinion, He had not done anything wrong and did not need anything, He replied as Adolf Eichmann, the Auschwitz Executioner, interrogated, the day before the execution, if he was sorry for what he had done. Or if anything I can think of some blasphemous hymn, like theHymn to Satan Carducci, or as those found in satanic sects or are tuned in magic rituals, as for example in Proclus, Iamblichus or Giordano Bruno, or those pagans or woodoo, or those produced or music rock or communism or Nazism or esoteric Freemasonry.

.

Enzo Bianchi speaks of his own subjective idea of ​​mercy

These absurd words of Bianchi bring to mind the equally absurd and blasphemous expression of Luther, who, convinced of the existence of a divine predestination to damnation, even he said that he would go willingly to Hell, if that should be God's will. It remains always impossible to perceive the merciful God without first accepting the just God. It is from the Old Testament God who comes to understand Jesus, God of the New Testament. It's because we know God based on reason, we can reach, in faith, believe in Christ. The gospel is the proclamation of the opportunity to gain eternal life, offered to all, but it sets conditions to obtain it: "If you would enter life, keep the commandments " [Mt 19,17]. There is the possibility of obtaining mercy; but it must do penance. Christ promises the opportunity to enter into the kingdom of God, but warns that those who do not believe, It will be condemned [MC 16,16].

.

The Gospel is supposed which it is in man's ability to choose either for God or against God. The kingdom of God is a gift of grace; yet it is necessary to conquer [Mt 11,12]; It is a "prize", for which must compete [The Cor 9,24]; It is a "precious pearl", which must be bought [Mt 13,45]; It is the pay good worker [Mt 20,1]. But the merit is a gift of grace. All good action of the just, after all, It is a gift of grace and mercy. But if the choice is against God, here come on stream justice punishing, until the infernal punishment. The Gospel, so, brings joy to the humble, the afflicted, to those who seek God, who have repented of their sins, who they respect the divine justice and believe in His mercy; I have gorgeous, the unrepentant, to the wicked, the promise of divine forgiveness of eternal life does not interest, because they are already full of themselves, them just this life and do not feel they need to lose, while the threat of divine punishment irritates them and makes them blaspheme.

.

Enzo Bianchi guest in the journal of the Italian Clergy, which they would never hosted writings and articles of many distinguished elderly priests with a life spent serving the Church and the People of God

White flips the spirit path: Needless to say with all firmness and clarity that we could not accept Christ, if I did not believe in God. For as we come to know that Christ is God, if we knew that God exists? Christ does not make us know that God exists, but that we already know by themselves according to reason, even before being informed by the Church of Christ preaching. Therefore the order is: by God to Christ, not by Christ to God. Christ gives us the knowledge of God and his will for us - the Holy Trinity, the baptism, faith, the Redemption, the grace, everlasting life, the church -, that with our simple reason, It had been that of Aristotle or Plato, we could never reach or imagine, if the Father himself, for his mercy, without his forced, through his Son, there he had given in the Holy Spirit. Christ makes known to us the mystery of the Father, that only He and the Father know, but based on the knowledge we already possess by reason and from the Old Testament. Jews and Muslims already know the true God, although they are not enlightened by the mystery of Christ. Through Christ did not come to believe in God SIC et simpliciter, but there comes a knowledge of God supernatural, revealed, infinitely superior to that of the simple reason. Our intelligence does not pass directly from the knowledge of the world to Christ, but come to Christ, object of faith, known by the Church's preaching, through the mediation of rational knowledge of God, cause and end of the universe, creator of heaven and earth.

.

Tll men know that God exists based on reason, that all men possess as. Only some of them, starting from the natural knowledge of God, and informed by the ecclesial catechesis, they arrive, if you come, enlightened by the grace, believe in Christ. Others may be enlightened by God without knowing it. The flipped speech Bianchi is therefore to one who can not who God or who Christ. By starting from Christ and reach God, Christ should be the same, which it is the deception of pantheism Christological Hegel. Or, It should possess an intuitive faith or experiential, Previous to reason, as in the Lutheran fideism. Instead it is the reason that you switch to the faith and not vice versa.

.

… too many confusions “under the same sky”

Faith is a divine knowledge. Now, is only the divine knowledge which starts from himself and passes to humans, because it creates. As for us, starting from the human that we can rise to the divine. Believing they can go the opposite way, You want to believe that our knowledge can be commenced by God and not by man, which is Hegelian idealism and scellinghiano.

.

In conclusion, the Bianchi prophecy is careful not to displease by the party animals, asking the prophets: "Us smooth things" [Is 30,10]. This is the message that Bianchi, young "prophet", he left mankind, by writing to 30 years of age, in a book that has had a worldwide success, enough to be translated into 35 languages, while precious works of medieval or Renaissance Dominican theologians and mystics are still waiting to be translated. Already St. Thomas shrewdly observes in fact that the number of fools is vastly greater than that of the wise. Well, never before has it proves valid this observation Aquinas. But what I wonder is now more like a character of this kind and with similar ideas succeeded in obtaining credit even to the Holy See, as it has happened since Blessed Pope Paul VI, with St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI, to the reigning Pontiff. We must really say that the devil is adept at masquerade as an angel of light, if he can cajole and circumvent even the Popes [cf. II Cor 11,14]. Naturally, White also has his good qualities, the study and the worship of God's Word, sensitivity to the Holy Spirit, l'ecumenism, the veneration of the Holy Fathers of the Church, the love for prayer and contemplation. Council anyway, to clarify things about him, the facts critical studies by Bishop. Antonio Love, in addition to the output next text edited by the young philosopher and theologian Dr.. George A.. Faccio Lince.

.

Varazze, 12 March 2017

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

– homiletics –

THE GOSPEL OF THE TEMPTATIONS : SEARCH THE DEMON OF HITTING THE WORD OF GOD IN HIS HUMANITY

.

If the devil can take pride in, relying on the weak points of the ambition and vanity, can make us what we want and get what craving since the dawn of time: who we prostrate ourselves before him and worshiping him call man. And for a better name man, then we will go directly into the house of Satan, as recently did the president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, to beatify the headquarters of the Radical Party the "spirituality" and "the precious heritage" of those who, such as the late Marco Pannella, the supreme gift of life attacked him and profaned, indicating as "civil rights" and as "social achievement" the monstrous crime of abortion [on the topic, see the article by John Cavalcoli: "Marco Pannella, “saint now !”», see WHO]

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

© www.gioba.it

In this brief passage from the Gospel we are faced with a paradox: really it happened that the devil has tempted God Incarnate, the Word was made flesh ? [CF. Mt 4, 1-11 - text WHO]. Perhaps the devil attempted to play God in his humanity, pretending to be unaware of what Jesus was divine in his humanity and his divinity in human. Blinded by pride and by the delirium of omnipotence tend to overestimate the most of themselves and to underestimate others, why they are doomed to defeat. It may be that they do not fall in the near, but inevitably fall at the first change of season, with the wilting of wildflowers.

.

In Gospel of the temptations, one would think just that: that the Devil overestimate himself and underestimate God [following full text …]

.

.

to read all the text, click below:

05.03.2017 Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo — IL VANGELO DELLE TENTAZIONI: THE DEMON IN SEARCH OF HITTING THE WORD OF GOD IN HIS HUMANITY

.

.

.

.

.

.

.